What's on your mind?
TEXT
POLL
QUIZ
- All45247 posts
- General32909 posts
- Help Desk290 posts
- Fanfics/Roleplays807 posts
- Polls5411 posts
- Memes/Images1314 posts
- News and Announcements638 posts
- Fun and Games1265 posts
- Questions and Answers2299 posts
- New on Disney Wiki314 posts
Sort by
Card Layout
I’ve heard a LOT of people complain about Wish. Not just on Fandom, but also on YouTube. I don’t know how old you guys are, but from what I see on YouTube, it’s really only adults that I hear complaining about it.
What I’m about to say next isn’t me saying that Wish has to be good in your opinion, but it’s just something to consider when you’re deciding if you like it or not.
Even though Wish is technically made for all ages, they’re gearing towards a kid audience. Do you ever really hear as many kids and teens complain about Wish as grown ups do? If not, then I’d say that it’s a win for Disney for the audience they’re directing it towards, right? I love Wish, and even though my friends haven’t seen it, they’re really excited to!
Let’s take dog treats for example. Let’s say that it’s human grade, meaning that humans and dogs can eat it. But it’s still geared towards dogs, right? So what happens if your dog loves it, and you don’t? Would you leave a bad review?
Of course, I’m perfectly fine if you say that you don’t like Wish. It’s just a movie, and there are plenty of movies that I don’t like, either. But how can Wish be “trash” if its main audience hardly complains?
I think a better way to word it, is to say that you personally don’t like Wish, but it’s okay if other people do, even if you don’t see why.
But anyway, that’s all. I love hearing everyone’s movie opinions, even if they’re different than mine. I just don’t like it when y’all act like your opinion is the final answer, and start telling everyone that it’s trash and a waste of time. Maybe it’s a waste of your time, but it might be how others spend theirs, you know?
Greetings, fellow Fandom-ers, I have a very special announcement for you all! At this very moment, I have just now reached 100 pages on my Wiki site (if you count the title page, that is). To celebrate this milestone, any and all who are interested, come on down to my page. I have character profiles, song lyrics, and summaries on various films, television shows, specials and short films I've seen over the years, both older and newer; some from sources that are popular, well-known and beloved to this very day, and some from sources that are sadly underrated and obscure, that have been highly forgotten with the passage of time. Some of these lesser-known sources you either may never have heard or known about before, or perhaps you saw once before and might just stir up some good memories and feelings of nostalgia for you.
However, before entering, a few disclaimers and rules about this Wiki:
1. First, foremost and most importantly, this wiki page is property of its author, especially all original articles created by said author. It is intended for reading, entertainment and educational purposes only. Any and all copying without permission from the author is strictly prohibited.
2. Any and all inappropriate or offensive comments will be deleted and/or blocked.
3. This wiki page has a limited selection, containing only information pertaining to sources familiar to the author. Not all characters, films, television programs, songs, etc. will be available (particularly if the author has not seen a certain source) or included (if the source is inappropriate or not on the author’s list). Additions of any sources outside the wiki’s parameters will be removed.
4. Some articles may take longer to upload than others, due to gathering any and all necessary information and details. If there’s someone or something any reader wishes to read about, please know that the article(s) will become available eventually.
5. Some summaries on films, television programs, specials and shorts may contain a link to their respective sources, mostly via YouTube, given if said sources are available for viewing, or if there is a copy with good color/sound quality, for any and all who may or may not have seen them before and wish to learn more.
All that being said and done, enjoy! Click the link below to begin exploring:
Figaro agrees that Everybody Wants to Be a Woof is a bad song
Mushu
Sven
19 Votes in Poll
And this is a good place to post it because the prime examples I am thinking of are Disney.
So, when an official sequel is made, but by different writers, do you go by it as canon? Especially if it doesn't line up with whatever the writers of the original film/s intended?
For instance, direct to video sequels. The original Aladdin, it seems the intent was for Jafar and Iago to remain trapped inside the lamp forever. In Return of Jafar, they escape when Iago gets partway out of the lamp and digs his way out of the sand, and later Iago reforms and kills Jafar. (Satisfying in pretty much the ONE area where the first film failed, you cannot pay me enough to go by this as non-canon no matter what)
Or, The Emperor's New Groove. As far as that film is concerned, Yzma's final punishment is living the rest of her life as a cat. But in Kronk's New Groove, she returns in human form with a cat's tail, is still up to no good (is even more evil than before), and presumably gets the same fate as Hopper, unless you go by the TV series as canon.
Of course, Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas has some inconsistencies and cannot be canon.
And Star Wars. George Lucas said Emperor Palpatine's death in Return of the Jedi was final and it was a huge part of Anakin's salvation, as well as fulfilling the prophecy. Yet the sequel trilogy of course says otherwise. (Which is inconsistent already with the Death Star ruins and such, and it is so disliked that peaple only want to go by it as canon either to spite George Lucas for making the prequel trilogy, and he dislikes the sequel trilogy too, or to spite me because Palpatine's death in RotJ is my number one favorite instance of that type of villain defeat.
(Edited by KillRoy231)
In the tangled series the crab 🦀 falls in love with flin rider
Mulan
Pocahontas
24 Votes in Poll
The creator of "The Ghost and Molly McGee"!
What do you fans of The Lion King think?
Comments below ⬇️
Dick Van Dyke
Mel Brooks
James Hong
Bob Newhart
June Squibb
James Earl Jones
14 Votes in Poll
Continuing this, this will take me from 1950-1967 I suppose and just my quick thoughts instead of being super in-depth. (I was going to add the Bronze Age but there's just a lot of time so it's easier to stick with the one era and do Bronze next time)
12. Cinderella (1950): My favorite of all the films of Walt's lifetime, bar none. The conflict over the power within the home of Cinderella and Lady Tremaine is one of the most interesting hero/villain relationships ever done, not just done with the elements of the ball but even reflected by the Jaq & Gus/Lucifer showdowns through the film. My only minor complaint is the pointlessness of Prince Charming; but his dad and the Grand Duke make up for it (he's been done better in many, many other Cinderella takes so having him as worthless is negligible; if I want more interesting I'll watch, say, "The Slipper and the Rose")
13. Alice in Wonderland (1951): I appreciate the honest take on Lewis Carrol's work, but the movie really only gets good in the second half with the Caterpillar, Cheshire Cat, the Mad Tea Party and the finale with the Queen of Hearts. Dealing with things like the Dodo and the Tweedles just always bored me; maybe it's also a bit too honest with it's depictions but I do like Alice does grow through this even if the ending is bizarre.
14. Peter Pan (1953): Probably what I consider Walt's "magnum opus"; he always seemed to want to get to this film and the way he does it is just the embodiment of fun and heart with Pan, Tink, Wendy and the over-the-top elements of Captain Hook who can be menacing some moments and ridiculous others. I even don't mind Tiger Lily...her tribe, yeah they're racist and un-PC as heck and "What Makes the Red Man Red" is cringe-inducing, but Tiger Lily at least feels honest.
15. Lady and the Tramp (1955): This is one of those Disney movies that seems to only be recognized for one scene anymore; yes "Bella Notte" is memorable...but seriously, the real movie isn't just that. To me, Lady's growth and evolution, especially the first half where she goes from spoiled pooch to a responsible protective dog is one of the best character evolutions of the era if not all of Disney. Tramp can get on my nerves and you do wonder if he's keeping too many skeletons in his doghouse, but he's worthwhile. (he's an early canine Flynn Rider to be honest) The influence of Peggy Lee is overwhelming, positive with...most of the music (the Siamese Cat song really is just cringy with some woman from North Dakota doing faux-Asian style), and negative in...basically saving Trusty and thus preventing death in Disney films for the next three decades (with only the next movie escaping due to how far along it was and probably starting work before this)
16. Sleeping Beauty (1959): Yeah...it's beautiful; Eyvind Earle's work will forever be immortalized by this one film and it's art design. But that's basically it; the whole thing is hollow being the most "honest" fairy tale depiction and basically just being about the Good Fairies vs. Maleficent with Aurora and Philip just pawns in their magical game. And unlike most, I don't consider Mal to be one of my favorite Disney villains, just being evil for evil's sake and the nonsense of the brainwashing she does to get Aurora to prick her finger.
17. One-Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961): I sort of have a bias being the first Disney film I saw in theaters due to a re-release, but it's a cute film but tough to get through. The early stuff with Pongo and Roger winning Perdita and Anita is fun and Cruella De Vil is a standout Disney villain giving us evil with actual personality and movement. But there are just too many puppies; when even the main litter of 15 is just not well characterized and then you add 84 more, it just ends up being "cute for cute sake"; and some of the later parts with the escape drag on forever.
18. The Sword in the Stone (1963): Another film with bias (my first VHS), I do find some fun elements to it but it almost feels hollow in the end. Merlin's fun, and I do like the squirrel scenario and Madam Mim, but what was it all for? Wart learns nothing from any of this and Merlin just....leaves just before he does what he does the sword thing because...destiny? It's just not earned and it hurts the lessons the movie wants to get across.
19. The Jungle Book (1967): The movie has issues but I always consider it a lot of fun. The trio of Mowgli, Baloo and Bagheera are easily the best things about it; but this is sort of where we start getting into the issue that makes up a good chunk of the next era of "characters just there for the sake of it that really accomplish nothing but be entertaining"; sure I like King Louie, but the elephants...and the vultures...yeesh. Shere Khan doesn't do as much as you think and just goes down way too easily considering he's built up all film; and while many complain of the ending with Shanti, I do like it since Mowgli's supposed to be an ambassador connecting the human and jungle world...and by returning to humanity, he can do just that.
Nick Wilde
Robin Hood
Tod
Honest John
43 Votes in Poll
mother gothel
frollo
king magnifico
scar
prince hans
gaston
18 Votes in Poll
Oliver
Figaro
Si and Am
Bonkers
30 Votes in Poll